Interviews - Cast and Crew

The upcoming epic thriller based on J. Robert Oppenheimer, the enigmatic man who must risk destroying the world in order to save it.
Ace
Posts: 2148
Joined: November 2012



Posts: 402
Joined: April 2022





Posts: 1439
Joined: October 2019

Posts: 402
Joined: April 2022

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
EOLB wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:01 pm
This has been the most intriguing interview so far, in my opinion.
I'm really interested in this scene between Conti and Murphy, with Strauss as a hapless pissed off observer misinterpreting their conversation, because I currently can't think of what that scene could possibly be. Obviously Princeton, probably 1947, but beyond that it's a mystery to me. Otherwise I love his nuanced and sympathetic interpretation of Strauss as someone who was blown off or slighted and is seeking revenge. Another interview had RDJ (and Nolan) comparing the dynamic between Oppenheimer and Strauss to that of Mozart and Salieri in Amadeus, and I really like that parallel. His admiration of Rami Malek's performance "putting [Strauss] in check" means I should probably look at what Hill's testimony actually was!

KEM
Posts: 1010
Joined: December 2019
physicshistoryguy wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:29 pm
EOLB wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:01 pm
This has been the most intriguing interview so far, in my opinion.
I'm really interested in this scene between Conti and Murphy, with Strauss as a hapless pissed off observer misinterpreting their conversation, because I currently can't think of what that scene could possibly be. Obviously Princeton, probably 1947, but beyond that it's a mystery to me. Otherwise I love his nuanced and sympathetic interpretation of Strauss as someone who was blown off or slighted and is seeking revenge. Another interview had RDJ (and Nolan) comparing the dynamic between Oppenheimer and Strauss to that of Mozart and Salieri in Amadeus, and I really like that parallel. His admiration of Rami Malek's performance "putting [Strauss] in check" means I should probably look at what Hill's testimony actually was!
Quick question since you’re very knowledgeable about these events… had Strauss and Oppenheimer known each other even before the Manhattan Project started? I haven’t fully read up on the story so I just assumed that Strauss only came into the picture after the bombs had been dropped and the trails started, I have no idea on if Strauss and Oppenheimer had actually met before that period of time

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
KEM wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:44 pm
physicshistoryguy wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:29 pm
EOLB wrote:
July 7th, 2023, 8:01 pm
This has been the most intriguing interview so far, in my opinion.
I'm really interested in this scene between Conti and Murphy, with Strauss as a hapless pissed off observer misinterpreting their conversation, because I currently can't think of what that scene could possibly be. Obviously Princeton, probably 1947, but beyond that it's a mystery to me. Otherwise I love his nuanced and sympathetic interpretation of Strauss as someone who was blown off or slighted and is seeking revenge. Another interview had RDJ (and Nolan) comparing the dynamic between Oppenheimer and Strauss to that of Mozart and Salieri in Amadeus, and I really like that parallel. His admiration of Rami Malek's performance "putting [Strauss] in check" means I should probably look at what Hill's testimony actually was!
Quick question since you’re very knowledgeable about these events… had Strauss and Oppenheimer known each other even before the Manhattan Project started? I haven’t fully read up on the story so I just assumed that Strauss only came into the picture after the bombs had been dropped and the trails started, I have no idea on if Strauss and Oppenheimer had actually met before that period of time
Well I think it's first important to note that Strauss had dipped his toe into the nuclear story a couple times before he met Oppenheimer. His parents had died of cancer in the mid-1930s, which motivated him to fund nuclear physicists with the hope that they could use their research for cancer treatment (Leo Szilard, later one of the key scientists of the Manhattan Project, was one of them). Later, after the war and as a naval officer, he made the proposal to nuke a fleet of ships to demonstrate to the world that the Navy was still relevant in an atomic world (this would become Operation Crossroads). But Strauss only enters Oppenheimer's story at the end of 1946 (actually, American Prometheus says that the two had met once shortly before the end of the war, but it must've been an inconsequential meeting and I know nothing about it) when he offered Oppenheimer the directorship of Princeton's Institute for Advanced Study (Strauss was one of the Institute's trustees). This is also around the time Strauss becomes one of the Atomic Energy Commission's first commissioners; Oppenheimer is appointed to the AEC's advisory committee the next year, so their relationship also develops that way. So your assumption was essentially correct! Although the trial took place eight years later, long enough for there to be bad blood between the two.

Also, I wouldn't say I'm very knowledgeable about this stuff; I've just read some books on the nuclear story enough times that I remember some things and can quickly check anything I've forgotten. :P

User avatar
Posts: 631
Joined: May 2017
I guess the movie will get quite personal with the Lewis Strauss character
Image

Posts: 285
Joined: April 2023
666kalpa wrote:
July 8th, 2023, 1:14 am
I guess the movie will get quite personal with the Lewis Strauss character
Image
I personally doubt the veracity of that as it stands, although perhaps I shouldn't.
Strauss married in 1923, when Oppenheimer was still an undergrad at Harvard, so presumably not a time the film is covering, and to my knowledge Strauss never remarried (unless they're referring to Strauss' son, but I can't find information on when he married except that it happened before 1950). Even so, the film may get personal with Strauss or it might not; my bet is that his family is going to at least appear in a scene for Strauss' 54th birthday party, when he tried to introduce his son and daughter-in-law to Oppenheimer, who rebuffed them and thus angered Strauss.

Ace
Posts: 2148
Joined: November 2012


Although Nolan is usually, shall we say, antiseptic in his approach to romance, Oppenheimer represents a significant shift. He told Wired the love story aspect “is as strong as I’ve ever done”. It features prolonged full nudity for Murphy and Florence Pugh, who plays Oppenheimer’s ex-fiancee, as well as sex, and there are complicated scenes with Emily Blunt, who plays his wife, “that were pretty heavy”. Murphy turns coy: “I’m under strict instructions not to give away anything.”

Post Reply